How words lose their luster boggles the mind.
At least it boggles my mind.
Back in the 18th century, German academics began classifying the ‘self’ — to be specific, the ‘mind’ — into what is known as the tripartite classification of mental activities.
Ok maybe now we know why some words lose their luster.
In the 19th century, American and British psychologists took the classification and began utilizing it in their own research, as well as with their patient work. They improved the original work and further honed the tripartite.
The three bits to the classification include cognition, affection, and conation. (Editor’s Note: even as I type conation, swirly red lines can be found underneath the word be it on a Mac or a PC, so even the ‘machine’ has no idea what it means.)
Cognition, as you know, deals with the “what“. It’s when we interpret, process and understand the gazillion number of data points and information strands that enter our mind each day.
Affection is more about the “how“. Think of it as whether you like someone (or something) or perhaps you don’t. Affection is whether you are attached to an idea, issue, person … or you’re not. (E.g. I possess a love affection for Denise)
But conation … the alleged ugly stepchild to the tripartite (it a candidate for Word of the Year in 2016) is arguably a word Simon Sinek might enjoy. It’s about the “why“. Conation comes from the Latin ‘conatus‘ or ‘conationem‘ and is defined as “any natural tendency, impulse, or directed effort.”
These days Oxford Dictionary defines conation as:
“the mental faculty of purpose, desire, or will to perform an action; volition.”
At its core, conation is rather brilliant. It has the capability of taking the knowledge, data and ideas you interpret and process (cognition) and blend it with your emotions, likes and dislikes (affection) into behaviour, purpose and action. In my mind, conation is the missing link in today’s organization as we seek a better balance with power, profit and purpose.
Conation is an aspect of human behavior that motivates leaders to independently seek out and create a better society.
I believe the will of the human spirit to do ‘good’ remains pervasive. (how and affection)
What’s missing? If our organizations — and leadership in general — is to shift away from a fixation on profit and power while improving society, employee engagement and our communities, perhaps it’s conation that’s now required. (why and action)
Some argue that conation “has been a neglected dimension of behavior in neuropsychological assessment” and that it just may be “the missing link between cognitive ability and prediction of performance capabilities in everyday life.”
I believe it’s one of the missing elements of leadership, and thus the true definition of purpose in the organization. It is through this dogged action — volition, perhaps — where we might once and for all improve work, life and society together.
Conation is my word of the year for 2015.
It’s time for us all to become conative.
Man never made any material as resilient as the human spirit. Bernard Williams