The name Sebastian Thrun may not mean much to you, but it should.
And if it doesnโt now โฆ it probably will at some point.
Last year, Professor Thrun of Stanford University and his colleague Professor Norvig opened up an otherwise closed AI university course to the world.
Instead of 200 students (tuition paying Stanford pupils) they ended up with what is arguably the worldโs largest MOOC when they opened up enrolment to citizens of Earth.
160,000 students enrolled in their โIntroduction to Artificial Intelligenceโ online version. For free.
Oh, and those 200 paying customers? ย About 170 left the face-to-face version in favour of the โfreeโ online one.
Amazingly, 20,000 people stuck around the course through to the final exam. Wherever you sit on the acceptance spectrum, that's a lot of students.
And no, it's my understanding that the โofficialโ students didnโt get their money back.
Now the story gets even more interesting.
Professor Thrun, a previously tenured academic at one of the most prestigious universities on the planet has, well โฆ discontinued his tenure.
Well, to be clear, he resigned his tenure role in April of 2011 to, as he says, โprimarily continue my employment with Google, and it predates my online classes.โ
And what is he up to now?
What he isnโt doing โฆ is asking Stanford to reinstate his tenure and become (again) a full-time professor.
Perhaps heโs an academic that recognizes the old world model of lecture to exam to grade to credential is becoming irrelevant in todayโs connected learning world. (let us not forget George, Dave and Stephen and #change11)
Due to, in part, seeing โthe true power of educationโ Thrun is launching Udacยญiยญty
What is it? Udacity is a free (open) online learnยญing platยญform that will provide education to anyยญone that wants it. The problem that I see with Udacity, however is it looks to have all the elements of becoming the newest form of an โelectronic bums in seatsโ model.
Check out the video of Thrun discussing Udacity at the Digital Life Design Conference. During the talk, he stated:
"Thereโs no turnยญing back. Itโs like a drug.โ
Thrun is about to launch Udacity with his first class entitled, CS 101: Buildยญing a Search Engine where he will co-teach with David Evans from the Uniยญverยญsiยญty of Virยญginia, although it seems as though David is going to remain tenured at his university.
Why am I so intrigued about Udacity?
Thrun is making headlines (some say again) in the higher education space (education reform perhaps?)
If it works, what will MIT, Harvard, Stanford et al do to adjust or combat?
If it works, what do corporate learning providers do going forward? (eg. Pearson and OpenClass)
If he offers a full curriculum, and a student completes it, will an employer want to see the โspecial piece of paperโ (ie. the credential) or will they hire regardless?
And just as when Yoda said to Obi-Wan, โno, there is anotherโ in Episode V, there now seems to be another Stanford example. May I introduce you to Coursera where two more Stanford professors (Daphne Koller and Andrew Ng) are offering Udacity-like education.
Iโm intrigued to see where this is going. Is higher education actually still relevant?
But there is another question. How will Udacity, Coursera, MITx amongst others actually map to the Connected Learning model that I proposed and continue to position? Itโs one thing to offer curricula online, itโs another to offer education that is part formal, informal and social. At this junction, itโs not clear to me that any of the aforementioned online systems are actually changing the system of education. I think it could be much more powerful if true social learning were, for example, made a priority in the integration of curricula to a student learning method like Udacity, Coursera, etc.
And no, iTunes U is not what Iโm looking for either. Neither is Khan.
How about you? What are your thoughts?
Do you think Thrun is about to change the education landscape? Or, do you think itโs online eLearning redux?
WORK-LIFE BLOOM
PERSONAL ASSESSMENT
Find out if youโre currently blooming, budding, stunted or in need of renewal through the Work-Life Bloom Personal Assessment.
We are so proud to have had you at our event. Your talk was a big hit. It moved us. We canโt thank you enough.
Malin Bjรถrnell, Salesforce
Dan challenged us to have clarity of purpose, both as individuals and as an organization. He related inspiring stories drawing on his experience in business, technology and academia. As he said, โThere is no ownership without belonging.โ
Christian Pantel, D2L
Fantastic engaging talk for our global partner summit. Thank you so much, Dan!
Barb Kinnard, CEO Response Biomedical Corp
Dan not only brought his presentation to life with his charisma, but also content, style and presentation finesse. Our members were especially interested in his thought provoking and top of mind topic on the future of work and how weโre going to be leading the next generation of leaders.
Cheryl Goodwin, CPA
Dan is a conference organizerโs ideal speaker. Not only did he inspire and energize our group, but he also masterfully adapted his content so it resonated with the audience and our conference theme. As a bonus, Dan is able to nimbly navigate to adjust to a reduced time slot when other speakers went over time without sacrificing the impact of his session.
Director and General Counsel
Dan accomplished what we set out to do, which was not only to be inspirational, but also to leave everyone with tools and food for thought / self-reflection to improve their personal and professional lives.